Sixteenth-century commentaries on Aristotle’s De generatione et corruptione, De caelo, and Meteorologica written by Agostino Nifo, Pietro Pomponazzi, Francesco Vimercato, Francisco Vallés, Lucilio Filalteo, and Lodovico Boccadiferro considered Plato’s views on the nature of matter and the geometrical formation of the elements, subjects for which Aristotle vehemently criticised Plato. Medieval commentators showed little interest in the historical Plato and largely accepted what they considered to be Aristotle’s interpretation. Renaissance commentators, however, had access to the entirety of the Timaeus and more writings of Platonists and Aristotelians from late antiquity. Consequently, Renaissance scholars discussed the Platonic solids and considered the criticisms of Aristotle found in Simplicius and Philoponus. The reading of Plato in universities dominated by Aristotelianism was tempered by the long tradition of textual reconciliation promoted by Neoplatonists and by their commitment to Galenic medicine, which also consolidated Aristotle’s and Plato’s views on nature, matter, and the elements.

Interpreting Plato’s Geometrical Elements in Renaissance Aristotle Commentaries

Craig Edwin Martin
2022-01-01

Abstract

Sixteenth-century commentaries on Aristotle’s De generatione et corruptione, De caelo, and Meteorologica written by Agostino Nifo, Pietro Pomponazzi, Francesco Vimercato, Francisco Vallés, Lucilio Filalteo, and Lodovico Boccadiferro considered Plato’s views on the nature of matter and the geometrical formation of the elements, subjects for which Aristotle vehemently criticised Plato. Medieval commentators showed little interest in the historical Plato and largely accepted what they considered to be Aristotle’s interpretation. Renaissance commentators, however, had access to the entirety of the Timaeus and more writings of Platonists and Aristotelians from late antiquity. Consequently, Renaissance scholars discussed the Platonic solids and considered the criticisms of Aristotle found in Simplicius and Philoponus. The reading of Plato in universities dominated by Aristotelianism was tempered by the long tradition of textual reconciliation promoted by Neoplatonists and by their commitment to Galenic medicine, which also consolidated Aristotle’s and Plato’s views on nature, matter, and the elements.
2022
Harmony and Contrast: Plato and Aristotle in the Early Modern Period
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Plato's Geometrical Elements scan.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Accesso chiuso-personale
Dimensione 8.89 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
8.89 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/3739715
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact