At the very end of Posterior Analytics, Aristotle writes that “nothing apart from intel- lective knowledge (noûs) can be truer than scientific knowledge (epistēmē)”. This claim may sound problematic in consideration of the Aristotelian Principle of Exluded-Mid- dle, which states that there are no intermediate degrees between truth and falsity. In fact, Aristotle's logic leaves no room for incremental truths, so that a more circumstan- tial understanding of such alleged superior truth is needed. After a critical discussion of some literature on the topic, the meaning of Aristotle’s alēthésteron (‘more true’) shall be understood here as meaning: (1) more exact because of its unitary object, (2) more certain and convincing, (3) more orientative and guiding, (4) conceptually antecedent, and, finally, (5) more causative of truth. Intellective knowledge will emerge as a non-in- ferential way of understanding, whose positive truth-value will always be the same as the one guaranteed by scientific knowledge.

In which sense is Intellective Knowledge said to be "more true" than Scientific Knowledge? – A problematic comparison in Aristotle, An. Post. II 19.

Matteo Cosci
2016-01-01

Abstract

At the very end of Posterior Analytics, Aristotle writes that “nothing apart from intel- lective knowledge (noûs) can be truer than scientific knowledge (epistēmē)”. This claim may sound problematic in consideration of the Aristotelian Principle of Exluded-Mid- dle, which states that there are no intermediate degrees between truth and falsity. In fact, Aristotle's logic leaves no room for incremental truths, so that a more circumstan- tial understanding of such alleged superior truth is needed. After a critical discussion of some literature on the topic, the meaning of Aristotle’s alēthésteron (‘more true’) shall be understood here as meaning: (1) more exact because of its unitary object, (2) more certain and convincing, (3) more orientative and guiding, (4) conceptually antecedent, and, finally, (5) more causative of truth. Intellective knowledge will emerge as a non-in- ferential way of understanding, whose positive truth-value will always be the same as the one guaranteed by scientific knowledge.
2016
37 - Aristotle's Posterior Analytics: An Analysis and Heritage
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Cosci_intellective-knowledge.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 526.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
526.92 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in ARCA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10278/3743817
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact